Wimbledon 2025: Controversial Line Calls Spark Debate on Technology in Tennis
Wimbledon 2025 faced controversy as electronic line-calling errors led to missed calls, sparking a debate on technology's role in tennis.

Wimbledon Apologizes for Electronic Line-Calling Errors
Wimbledon organizers have issued an apology following a series of missed calls due to the electronic line-calling system being deactivated on Centre Court. The incident occurred during a fourth-round match between Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Sonay Kartal, where three calls were not picked up on the affected side of the court.
The Incident
In the first set of the match, a backhand from Kartal was clearly out, but the electronic system failed to make the call. Pavlyuchenkova stopped play, and chair umpire Nico Helwerth halted the game to investigate. It was later revealed that the system had been deactivated due to a server-side error.
Player Reactions
Pavlyuchenkova expressed her frustration, stating that the game was 'stolen' from her. She questioned why the umpire did not make the call himself, especially since he later admitted to seeing the ball out. Kartal, on the other hand, went on to win the replayed point and eventually the game.
Technology Under Scrutiny
This incident has reignited the debate on the reliability of technology in tennis. Many players, including Emma Raducanu and Belinda Bencic, have voiced concerns over the accuracy of electronic line-calling. Despite the controversy, some players like Iga Swiatek have expressed their trust in the system.
Rulebook Protocol
According to the rulebook, if the electronic system fails to make a call, the chair umpire is responsible for making the decision. If the umpire is unable to determine the call, the point is replayed. This protocol applies only to point-ending shots or when a player stops play.
Moving Forward
Wimbledon organizers have reviewed their processes and made necessary changes to prevent such errors in the future. The incident serves as a reminder of the challenges in integrating technology into traditional sports and the importance of maintaining a balance between human judgment and technological assistance.
Conclusion
While technology has brought significant advancements to tennis, incidents like these highlight the need for continuous improvement and scrutiny. As the sport evolves, finding the right balance between technology and human oversight will be crucial in ensuring fair play and maintaining the integrity of the game.